banner

PENNumbra is pleased to host debates between respected scholars on current controversies. The format includes an opening statement, a rebuttal, and closing statements by each side. Each contribution is expected to be one to two times the length of an average opinion/editorial newspaper article (i.e., 1,000-2,000 words), and without footnotes. Scholars interested in participating in a PENNumbra Debate should email the PENNumbra Editor at editor@pennumbra.com.

FEATURED DEBATE
The Contraception Mandate and Religious Freedom
by Steven D. Smith & Caroline Mala Corbin
0 0
Steven D. Smith Caroline Mala Corbin

In 2012, the Obama Administration announced its plan to require most American employers to cover the costs of contraception for female employees under employer-provided healthcare plans. According to Professor Steven Smith, the Contraception Mandate violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and perhaps, the Constitution. According to Professor Caroline Corbin, the Mandate satisfies strict scrutiny, and thus, should survive both RFRA and constitutional challenge.

RECENT DEBATES
Immigration Preemption after United States v. Arizona
by Kit Johnson & Peter J. Spiro

Judicial Recusal and the Court
by Sherrilyn A. Ifill & Eric J. Segall

America Invents, More or Less?
by Jason Rantanen & Lee Petherbridge & Jay P. Kesan

The Alien Tort Statute and Corporate Liability
by Susan Farbstein & Tyler Giannini & Anthony Clark Arend

Climate Change and the Courts
by Jason Scott Johnston & Heidi M. Hurd

The Role of Judges in Election Law
by Daniel P. Tokaji & Allison R. Hayward


Previous Debates From:




Preferred format
Preferred format